Romans 2:12 NKJV - "For as many as have sinned
without law will also perish without law, and as many as have sinned in the law
will be judged by the law"
Romans 4:15 NKJV -
"because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no
transgression."
Answer:
Moses’ covenant is used in the law of Muslim nations
even today also. It is written in Genesis 24:65 that she took a veil and
covered herself, adulterous woman is stoned to death, for those who steal,
their hands will be cut off, and those who sinned are beaten by a rope. “Harm
for harm” is the fury of the covenant. In the Christian countries in which the
covenant is not followed, love, happiness, longsuffering, service etc., is
performing their deeds.
If any one does the sin i.e. theft, adultery, etc.,
they are punished in the prison. If he changes his mind and follows the rules
obediently, it is also happened in now a days that his punishment will be
reduced and released from the prison.
So, in the Christian countries, there is no covenant.
So, there is no transgression among the Christians. There is a chance to happen
the transgression among the Christians by false apostles, false preachers and
hypocritical people in Romans 4:15. There is no chance for transgression
between the Christian believers among their social services. There is no chance
for transgression before Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, etc., who wear the
divine love of the Lord Christ and show His love in their life.
Yet, what is meant by trespasses? What is meant by
sin? What is the difference between the sin
and transgression? Transgression means to deviate from the disciplined path. Ephesians
2:1, “And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins”. Let us know
these from the examples.
Eve was separated from Adam and went near the serpent
alone and heard the words in the teaching of the serpent. Here, “Eve left
Adam,” is the transgression, “Eve went near the serpent alone and heard the
words of the serpent’s teaching,” is trespass. There is no covenant for them.
So, there was no sin for them, even then they violated the command of the Lord.
If she had not eaten the fruit, there would have been no sin for her. But, she
ate the fruit, and committed sin.
Likewise, King David must be with his nation in the
battle field, but he became lazy and was moving to and fro on the roof of the
king’s house. He, who saw her bathing, had lust on the woman. Here, “King David
must be with his nation in the battle field, but he was separated,” is the
transgression. “He had lust on woman when he saw her bathing”, is the trespass.
Even through, there was covenant; there was no sin in these incidents. But,
King David ravished her and killed her husband. Here, the sin had a place. So,
the punishment was given to sins of King David, Adam and Eve either with
covenant or without covenant.
So, there may be the covenant, if one did
transgression and trespasses, when he stops at that situation and changes his
mind, there is no place for sin. If sin occurs by crossing over the
transgression and trespasses, there must be the punishment either with covenant
or without covenant.
No comments :
Post a Comment